RE: QM

From: Higgo James <james.higgo.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 08:43:47 +0100

All we know is that symmetry is broken, the simplest explanation is that
it's broken everywhere (AUH) and the rest is WAP. It may be glib, but it
works, and you don't seem to get it. If you drop your keys on a dark street,
look under the streetlight. Don't curse the light for being there.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell Standish [SMTP:R.Standish.domain.name.hidden]
> Sent: Tuesday, 27 June, 2000 2:15 AM
> To: james.higgo.domain.name.hidden
> Cc: everything-list.domain.name.hidden
> Subject: Re: QM
>
> Higgo James wrote:
> >
> > Trying to derive SE from AUH is like trying to derive 'Jacques Mallah'
> from
> > AUH.
> >
> > It's very easy: all universes exists, so some thoughts of the cleass
> "the SE
> > is -i hbar d/dt psi = H psi" exist.
> >
> > Some thoughts of the class "why is the SE -i hbar d/dt psi = H psi"
> also
> > exist - and by WAP we shouldn't wonder why we *are* (not think, but are)
> > such a thought. If we weren't, we wouldn't wonder it...
> >
> > James
>
> This is a very glib response that doesn't do justice to the
> question. In essence you are saying that the SE is due to some kind of
> symmetry breaking. If true, than I will immediately ask what is the
> symmetry that is being broken, and why is the symmetrical disallowed?
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> Dr. Russell Standish Director
> High Performance Computing Support Unit, Phone 9385 6967
>
> UNSW SYDNEY 2052 Fax 9385 6965
> Australia R.Standish.domain.name.hidden
> Room 2075, Red Centre http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
Received on Tue Jun 27 2000 - 01:17:22 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:07 PST