Higgo James wrote:
>
> Trying to derive SE from AUH is like trying to derive 'Jacques Mallah' from
> AUH.
>
> It's very easy: all universes exists, so some thoughts of the cleass "the SE
> is -i hbar d/dt psi = H psi" exist.
>
> Some thoughts of the class "why is the SE -i hbar d/dt psi = H psi" also
> exist - and by WAP we shouldn't wonder why we *are* (not think, but are)
> such a thought. If we weren't, we wouldn't wonder it...
>
> James
This is a very glib response that doesn't do justice to the
question. In essence you are saying that the SE is due to some kind of
symmetry breaking. If true, than I will immediately ask what is the
symmetry that is being broken, and why is the symmetrical disallowed?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Russell Standish Director
High Performance Computing Support Unit, Phone 9385 6967
UNSW SYDNEY 2052 Fax 9385 6965
Australia R.Standish.domain.name.hidden
Room 2075, Red Centre
http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Mon Jun 26 2000 - 18:10:53 PDT