Re: No(-)Justification Justifies The Everything Ensemble

From: Hal Ruhl <HalRuhl.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:18:24 -0400

Hi Marc:

The objects I use are divisions of the list - such divisions are
static elements of the power set.

My objects have nothing to do with programing and do not change -
they can be the current state of a something on its path to completion.

Hal

At 12:13 AM 9/18/2007, you wrote:



>On Sep 18, 1:24 pm, Hal Ruhl <HalR....domain.name.hidden> wrote:
> > Hi Youness:
> >
> > Bruno has indeed recommended that I study in more detail the
> > underlying mathematics that I may be appealing to. The response that
> > I have made may be a bit self serving but at this point in my life I
> > am having difficultly adding yet another area of skill to my resume.
>
>My advise: Listen to Bruno. Your ideas are riddled with very basic
>errors. Example below:
>
>
>Basic Error:
>
>
> > There is no reason to create a multi-layered system distinguishing
> > between a sub list and the object it identifies.
>
>Yes there is. Objects not only have identities, they also have states
>and behaviours. This is object-oriented-programming 101. A set of
>properties only defines an identity condition.
>
>
>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Tue Sep 18 2007 - 21:18:26 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:14 PST