I do see one mistake I made.
>A "Nothing" is incomplete since it can not resolve any question but
>there is one it must resolve - that of its own duration. So it is
>unstable - it eventually "decays" [Big Bang] into a something that
>follows a path to completion by becoming an ever increasing sub
>division of its list - that is,
it evolves by becoming one object after another - a progression of
objects - an evolving universe.
I said the post was surely informal. To clarify a few issues: by
"question" I mean "meaningful question" and by "path to completion" I
mean the incorporation of one or another resolution of a meaningful
question the current system has insufficient content to otherwise
resolve. So the process is "mathematical" but not mathematical
system specific. By "duration" re the Nothing I do not intend a time
factor but something more like a resource.
Hal Ruhl
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Tue Sep 18 2007 - 22:14:51 PDT