Re: No(-)Justification Justifies The Everything Ensemble

From: <marc.geddes.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:08:51 -0000

On Sep 19, 1:18 pm, Hal Ruhl <HalR....domain.name.hidden> wrote:
> Hi Marc:
>
> The objects I use are divisions of the list - such divisions are
> static elements of the power set.
>
> My objects have nothing to do with programing and do not change -
> they can be the current state of a something on its path to completion.
>
> Hal
>

It sounded to me like you were confusing universals and particulars.
The list of properties used to define an object (the univerasl) cannot
be equated to a particular instance of an object possessing these
properties (a particular). That's why in programming there's a sharp
division between classes and objects when modelling the world.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Wed Sep 19 2007 - 04:09:03 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:14 PST