Bruno Marchal writes:> What is correct, and has been singled out by Stathis, is that comp > eludes the "material implementation" problem, given that we take all > abstract possible relationship between those objects, and they are all > well defined as purely number theoretical relations. Note that this is > something I have tried to explain to Jacques Mallah sometimes ago, but > without much success. This does not make much sense in ASSA approaches, > but, like George Levy I think, I don't believe in absolute probability > of being me, or of living my current "observer moment". Such a > probability can be given the value one (said George) but it is close of > saying that the universe is here, which tells us nothing, really. It is > like answering "who are you?" by I am me".I'm satisfied with this summary. The physical implementation problem is not a problem when considering abstract machines. Stathis Papaioannou
_________________________________________________________________
Live Search: Better results, fast
http://get.live.com/search/overview
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sat Feb 03 2007 - 04:05:54 PST