So now we have to find some way sto tackle the problem of finding the
right level of abstraction to pursue ...
Bruno
Le 03-févr.-07, à 10:05, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit :
> Bruno Marchal writes:
>
> > What is correct, and has been singled out by Stathis, is that comp
> > eludes the "material implementation" problem, given that we take all
> > abstract possible relationship between those objects, and they are
> all
> > well defined as purely number theoretical relations. Note that this
> is
> > something I have tried to explain to Jacques Mallah sometimes ago,
> but
> > without much success. This does not make much sense in ASSA
> approaches,
> > but, like George Levy I think, I don't believe in absolute
> probability
> > of being me, or of living my current "observer moment". Such a
> > probability can be given the value one (said George) but it is close
> of
> > saying that the universe is here, which tells us nothing, really. It
> is
> > like answering "who are you?" by I am me".
>
> I'm satisfied with this summary. The physical implementation problem
> is not
> a problem when considering abstract machines.
>
> Stathis Papaioannou
>
> Live Search: Better results, fast Try it now!
> >
>
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Mon Feb 05 2007 - 11:33:14 PST