It may be a freshman philosophy question, but it can't be a physics
question because you are dealing with issues occurring before our known
physics were established.
Hal Ruhl wrote:
> At 02:37 PM 1/18/2005, you wrote:
>
>> I remember your previous posts on "nothing", and how it decays.
>> However, this concept requires an intelligence to be present with
>> "nothing" to cause nothingness to decay, does it not? It is
>> intelligence and consciousness which defines things and makes
>> relative comparisons.
>> Danny Mayes
>
>
>
> Actually no. The meaningful question that the Nothing must resolve is
> its own stability - persistence. This is the case in both models. It
> is a freshman physics question. The Nothing must resolve it but can
> not. This causes the decay into a Something if you will in both
> models. In the model free of an "All" once this happens it continues
> to complete itself by some path. This is a creation of information
> scenario. Choice is the way to do this.
>
> Hal
>
>
>
--
Danny Mayes
Law Office of W. Daniel Mayes
130 Waterloo St., SW
P.O. Drawer 2650
Aiken, SC 29802
(803) 648-6642
(803) 648-4049 fax
877-528-5598 toll free
dmayes.domain.name.hidden
Received on Tue Jan 18 2005 - 16:46:20 PST