Re: Belief Statements

From: Hal Ruhl <HalRuhl.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:03:06 -0500

At 02:37 PM 1/18/2005, you wrote:
>I remember your previous posts on "nothing", and how it decays.
>However, this concept requires an intelligence to be present with
>"nothing" to cause nothingness to decay, does it not? It is intelligence
>and consciousness which defines things and makes relative comparisons.
>Danny Mayes


Actually no. The meaningful question that the Nothing must resolve is its
own stability - persistence. This is the case in both models. It is a
freshman physics question. The Nothing must resolve it but can not. This
causes the decay into a Something if you will in both models. In the model
free of an "All" once this happens it continues to complete itself by some
path. This is a creation of information scenario. Choice is the way to do
this.

Hal
Received on Tue Jan 18 2005 - 16:09:31 PST