Re: Belief Statements

From: Hal Ruhl <HalRuhl.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:59:47 -0500

At 04:41 PM 1/18/2005, you wrote:
>It may be a freshman philosophy question, but it can't be a physics
>question because you are dealing with issues occurring before our known
>physics were established.

You really miss the point. It is a question of logic and finding an
unavoidable meaningful question for the Nothing. The question - various
stabilities of a construct is first covered in freshman physics.

Hal
Received on Tue Jan 18 2005 - 20:04:19 PST