Re: Belief Statements

From: Danny Mayes <dmayes.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:37:01 -0500

I remember your previous posts on "nothing", and how it decays.
However, this concept requires an intelligence to be present with
"nothing" to cause nothingness to decay, does it not? It is
intelligence and consciousness which defines things and makes relative
comparisons.

Danny Mayes

Hal Ruhl wrote:

> What I am really talking about is availability of choice.
>
> My All/Nothing model appears to preclude choice. In this it seems a
> member of a class that assume all information already exists.
>
> Awhile ago I posted on another model in which there is a Nothing.
> This Nothing suffers the same incompleteness issue as the one in the
> All/Nothing model. In this case to resolve this issue the Nothing
> spontaneously decays into a Something which then sets off on a trip to
> completion. This model seems to insist on the presence of choice.
>
> Hal
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Danny Mayes
Law Office of W. Daniel Mayes
130 Waterloo St., SW
P.O. Drawer 2650
Aiken, SC 29802
(803) 648-6642
(803) 648-4049 fax
877-528-5598 toll free
dmayes.domain.name.hidden
Received on Tue Jan 18 2005 - 14:47:27 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:10 PST