Re: Dreaming On

From: Flammarion <peterdjones.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 09:23:58 -0700 (PDT)

On 2 Sep, 16:56, David Nyman <david.ny....domain.name.hidden> wrote:
> 2009/9/2 Brent Meeker <meeke....domain.name.hidden>:
>
> > But the physical implementation (cause?) is invariant in it's functional
> > relations. That's why two physical implementations which are different
> > at some lower level can be said to implement the same computation at a
> > higher level. I see nothing incoherent is saying that two physically
> > different computers perform the same computation. So if mental states
> > are certain kinds of computations (either physically realized or in
> > Platonia) they can be realized on different, i.e. non-invariant physical
> > processes. What's incoherent about that?
>
> I wonder what you mean by "either physically realized or in Platonia"?
> ISTM that there is not one assumption here, but two. If computation
> is restricted to the sense of physical realisation, then there is
> indeed nothing problematic in saying that "two physically different
> computers perform the same computation". We can understand what is
> meant without ambiguity; 'different' is indeed different, and any
> identity is thus non-physical (i.e. relational). But 'realisation' of
> such relational identity in Platonia in the form of an invariant
> experiential state is surely something else entirely: i.e. if it is a
> supplementary hypothesis to PM it is dualism.

Why would a believer in CTM need to make that additional step?
(You seem to be talkign about the abstract computaitonal state
having exitence independent from its concrete physcial
isntantiations).

> The point of Bruno's
> argument is to force a choice between the attachment of experience to
> physical process or computation; but not both at the same time.

I see no problem with mental states attaching to phsycial processes
"via" the computaitons instantiated by them. AFAICS that is still CTM.
Since every instance of a computation *is* an instance of a phsycial
process as well, there is no either/or.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Wed Sep 02 2009 - 09:23:58 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:16 PST