Re: Dreams and measure

From: Bruno Marchal <marchal.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:46:50 +0100

On 11 Feb 2009, at 18:30, Saibal Mitra wrote:

>
> Welcome back Jack Mallah!
>
> I have a different argument against QTI.
>
> I had a nice dream last night, but unfortunately it suddenly ended.
> Now, this is empirical evidence against QTI because, according to the
> QTI, the life expectancy of the version of me simulated in that dream
> should have been be infinite.




The notion of "ending" makes sense only relatively to something
"ending latter or not ending".

With most definition of first person (including both UDA and AUDA
definitions) "first person ending" just makes no sense.

Topologically, life is an open set.

Bruno



http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Thu Feb 12 2009 - 09:56:07 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:15 PST