Re: adult vs. child

From: Bruno Marchal <marchal.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:49:03 +0100

On 11 Feb 2009, at 20:47, Brent Meeker wrote:

>
> Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>> On 11 Feb 2009, at 00:38, GŁnther Greindl wrote:
>>
>>> I'm with Mike and Brent.
>>>
>>> Bruno, giving A1 and A2 mirrors which would show different stuff
>>> violates Stathis' assumption of running the _same_ computation - you
>>> can't go out of the system.
>>
>> See my answer to Brent. Once A1 looks at itself in the mirror (and
>> thus A2 too, given the protocol). A1 sees MA1 and A2 sees MA2, and
>> the
>> computation differs.
>
> If A1 sees MA1 and A2 sees MA2 and they see something different,
> i.e. MA1 and
> MA2 are distinguishable, then you've violated the hypothesis that the
> computations are identical.


Right? I did change the protocol to make my point, which concerns only
the probability of finding myself by MA1 or by MA2, but not both.

Bruno





http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Thu Feb 12 2009 - 09:49:20 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:15 PST