Re: KIM 2.3 (was Re: Time)

From: Stathis Papaioannou <stathisp.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:44:46 +1100

2009/1/11 Brent Meeker <meekerdb.domain.name.hidden>:

> I'm suggesting that "running a state" is incoherent.

A machine running a program goes through a sequence of states.
Consider 20 consecutive states, s1 to s20, which give rise to several
moments of consciousness. Would you say that running the sequence s1
to s20 on a single machine m1 will give a different conscious
experience to running s1 to s10 on m1 and separately s11 to s20 on m2?

-- 
Stathis Papaioannou
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Received on Sun Jan 11 2009 - 03:44:54 PST