Re: KIM 2.3 (was Re: Time)

From: Brent Meeker <meekerdb.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:00:36 -0800

Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> 2009/1/10 Brent Meeker <meekerdb.domain.name.hidden>:
>
>
>> The question is how is the simulated observer made conscious of the passage of
>> (simulated) time. If you just look a momentary machine states, ignoring their
>> causal/temporal relations, how will they create the consciousness of time in the
>> simulated observer?
>>
>
> Are you suggesting that the observer would be conscious of the passage
> of time through two consecutive machine states, s1 and s2, running on
> the one machine m1, but not if s1 is run on m1 (which is then stopped)
> and s2 run on a separate machine m2?
>
>
>
I'm suggesting that "running a state" is incoherent.

Brent

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sun Jan 11 2009 - 02:00:43 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:15 PST