Re: KIM 2.3 (was Re: Time)

From: Brent Meeker <>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:55:08 -0800

Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> 2009/1/11 Brent Meeker <>:
>> I'm suggesting that "running a state" is incoherent.
> A machine running a program goes through a sequence of states.
> Consider 20 consecutive states, s1 to s20, which give rise to several
> moments of consciousness. Would you say that running the sequence s1
> to s20 on a single machine m1 will give a different conscious
> experience to running s1 to s10 on m1 and separately s11 to s20 on m2?
I'm suggesting that there has to be something that makes the states a
sequence instead of just a set or an aggregate.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at
Received on Sun Jan 11 2009 - 11:55:22 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:15 PST