Re: KIM 2.3 (was Re: Time)

From: Brent Meeker <meekerdb.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:55:08 -0800

Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> 2009/1/11 Brent Meeker <meekerdb.domain.name.hidden>:
>
>
>> I'm suggesting that "running a state" is incoherent.
>>
>
> A machine running a program goes through a sequence of states.
> Consider 20 consecutive states, s1 to s20, which give rise to several
> moments of consciousness. Would you say that running the sequence s1
> to s20 on a single machine m1 will give a different conscious
> experience to running s1 to s10 on m1 and separately s11 to s20 on m2?
>
>
I'm suggesting that there has to be something that makes the states a
sequence instead of just a set or an aggregate.

Brent

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sun Jan 11 2009 - 11:55:22 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:15 PST