Re: KIM 2.3 (was Re: Time)

From: Stathis Papaioannou <stathisp.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:24:54 +1100

2009/1/9 Brent Meeker <meekerdb.domain.name.hidden>:

>> But in a block universe, where each frame contains all of the
>> information for a particular time, the order is implicit.
>
> What makes it implicit?... increasing entropy? ...conformance to dynamical laws?
> These are things outside the frames. If you assume there is enough inside
> the frames to order them (as a continuum model does by implicit overlap) then
> that is a time order and it's meaningless to talk about shuffling or separating
> them (in what spacetime could such operations be carried out?).

Consider a simulation of an observer watching a falling stone, running
on a digital computer. Does the observer have any way of knowing
whether the simulation is being run serially, in parallel, on how many
and what kinds of physical machines, at what speed, or in what order?


-- 
Stathis Papaioannou
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Fri Jan 09 2009 - 21:25:00 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:15 PST