Re: KIM 2.3 (was Re: Time)

From: Brent Meeker <meekerdb.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:00:23 -0800

Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> 2009/1/9 Brent Meeker <meekerdb.domain.name.hidden>:
>
>>> But in a block universe, where each frame contains all of the
>>> information for a particular time, the order is implicit.
>> What makes it implicit?... increasing entropy? ...conformance to dynamical laws?
>> These are things outside the frames. If you assume there is enough inside
>> the frames to order them (as a continuum model does by implicit overlap) then
>> that is a time order and it's meaningless to talk about shuffling or separating
>> them (in what spacetime could such operations be carried out?).
>
> Consider a simulation of an observer watching a falling stone, running
> on a digital computer. Does the observer have any way of knowing
> whether the simulation is being run serially, in parallel, on how many
> and what kinds of physical machines, at what speed, or in what order?
>
>

Is the observer conscious of a passage to time?

Brent

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sat Jan 10 2009 - 01:00:42 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:15 PST