Hin
2008/11/7 Tom Caylor <daddycaylor.domain.name.hidden>:
>
> Anna, OK, I understand.
>
> Thomas, as another reference point for study, what I refer to as the
> point of view from the Plenitude, or Plotinus' One, has frequently
> been referred to as the "God's eye point of view".
> (I didn't bring that up at first because I believe in a God who is
> different from the Plenitude or Plotinus' One, both of which are
> impersonal. By the way, the personal God is the only one in whom a
> person can possibly believe, but that could be another topic.)
>
> Tom
Well... could you explain why a personal god is the *only one* a
person can *possibly* believe ? because there is a little problem
here... I do not believe in a personal god... yet I exist... so I'm
possible... so believing in a personal god is not the only one a
person can believe in... cqfd
--
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Fri Nov 07 2008 - 13:13:50 PST