Anna, OK, I understand.
Thomas, as another reference point for study, what I refer to as the
point of view from the Plenitude, or Plotinus' One, has frequently
been referred to as the "God's eye point of view".
(I didn't bring that up at first because I believe in a God who is
different from the Plenitude or Plotinus' One, both of which are
impersonal. By the way, the personal God is the only one in whom a
person can possibly believe, but that could be another topic.)
Tom
On Nov 7, 10:31 am, "A. Wolf" <a.lup....domain.name.hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Tom Caylor <daddycay....domain.name.hidden> wrote:
>
> > Anna's explanation was from the frequentist side.
> > Gunther's was from the Bayesian side.
>
> I actually agree with the Bayesian point of view, but I was trying to
> avoid injecting expectation into a description of how infinite domains
> can have probability distributions in a "conceptual" sense.
>
> Anna
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Fri Nov 07 2008 - 12:53:23 PST