On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Tom Caylor <daddycaylor.domain.name.hidden> wrote:
>
> Anna's explanation was from the frequentist side.
> Gunther's was from the Bayesian side.
I actually agree with the Bayesian point of view, but I was trying to
avoid injecting expectation into a description of how infinite domains
can have probability distributions in a "conceptual" sense.
Anna
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Fri Nov 07 2008 - 12:31:29 PST