Nice. I see beauty in the Mandelbrot set. However, there seems to be
a lot of deja vu, similar repetition on a theme. I have never been
able to find anything resembling a beautiful girl, or even a mother-in-
law, or a white rabbit. This seems to go against your conjecture.
Tom
On Aug 12, 8:30 am, Bruno Marchal <marc....domain.name.hidden> wrote:
> On 09 Aug 2008, at 09:44, Tom Caylor wrote:
>
> > I believe that nature is not primarily functional. It is primarily
> > beautiful.
> > And this from a theist? Yes! This is actually to the core point of
> > why I am a theist. I don't blame people for not believing in God if
> > they think God is about functionality.
>
> If you remember my conjecture that the Mandelbrot Set, (well, its
> complement in the complex plane), is Turing complete (that is
> equivalent in some sense to a universal dovetailing), then zooming in
> it gives a picture of the arithmetical multiverse or of the universal
> deployment. And I do find most of them wonderfully beautiful. Here is
> my favorite on youtube:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0nmVUU_7IQ
>
> Is that not wonderful? Awesome ?
>
> Bruno
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Wed Aug 13 2008 - 00:17:14 PDT