Re: Intelligence, Aesthetics and Bayesianism: Game over!

From: Bruno Marchal <marchal.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:30:24 +0200

On 09 Aug 2008, at 09:44, Tom Caylor wrote:

> I believe that nature is not primarily functional. It is primarily
> beautiful.
> And this from a theist? Yes! This is actually to the core point of
> why I am a theist. I don't blame people for not believing in God if
> they think God is about functionality.


If you remember my conjecture that the Mandelbrot Set, (well, its
complement in the complex plane), is Turing complete (that is
equivalent in some sense to a universal dovetailing), then zooming in
it gives a picture of the arithmetical multiverse or of the universal
deployment. And I do find most of them wonderfully beautiful. Here is
my favorite on youtube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0nmVUU_7IQ

Is that not wonderful? Awesome ?

Bruno




http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Tue Aug 12 2008 - 11:30:35 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:15 PST