Re: Evidence for the simulation argument - and Thanks and a dumb question.

From: Stathis Papaioannou <stathisp.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:09:06 +1100

On 3/10/07, John Mikes <jamikes.domain.name.hidden> wrote:

i ENVY YOU, guys, to "know" so much about BHs to speak of a singularity.
> I would not go further than "according to what is said about them, they
> may
> wash off whatever got into and turn into - sort of - a singularity".
> Galaxies, whatever, fall into those hypothetical BHs and who knows how
> much
> Dark Matter (the assumed), we just "don't know" - it all may be neatly
> stuffed
> in and escape from the habitual description of the 'singularity' as an
> indiscernible
> structural view, - or - as seemingly you assume: they homogenize (paste?)
> it all into a - well - singularity-content.
>
> Whoever KNOWS more about singularities, BHs, Dark Matter, should
> speak up - please: NO assumptions ('it got to be's) or deductions of such!
>
>

We don't know. We only guess on the basis of our best evidence and theories.

Stathis Papaioannou

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sat Mar 10 2007 - 06:09:13 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:13 PST