Re: The Meaning of Life

From: Bruno Marchal <marchal.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 15:25:21 +0100

Le 10-mars-07, ā 04:30, Tom Caylor a écrit :

> Here a diagram would be useful. The reductionist tendency seems to be
> to lump all of consciousness into the "input interpretting" box and
> "explain it" in terms of smaller parts making up an autonomous
> machine. Hence, now that it is all explained and we are a machine,
> there is no room for real morality and we can do whatever we want. (I
> think I heard an Amen! from Brent.)

This is a good description of comp before Gödel and Church's thesis.
After, comp makes such interpretations provably wrong or inconsistent.
To understand comp + Gödel forces us toward more modesty, including the
modesty in front on any self-referentially correct (by constuction)
universal machine or entity.

Bruno


http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sat Mar 10 2007 - 09:25:56 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:13 PST