Re: Evidence for the simulation argument - and Thanks and a dumb question.

From: John Mikes <jamikes.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:37:49 -0500

i ENVY YOU, guys, to "know" so much about BHs to speak of a singularity.
I would not go further than "according to what is said about them, they may
wash off whatever got into and turn into - sort of - a singularity".
Galaxies, whatever, fall into those hypothetical BHs and who knows how much
Dark Matter (the assumed), we just "don't know" - it all may be neatly
stuffed
in and escape from the habitual description of the 'singularity' as an
indiscernible
structural view, - or - as seemingly you assume: they homogenize (paste?)
it all into a - well - singularity-content.

Whoever KNOWS more about singularities, BHs, Dark Matter, should
speak up - please: NO assumptions ('it got to be's) or deductions of such!

John M

On 3/8/07, Stathis Papaioannou <stathisp.domain.name.hidden> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/9/07, Mark Peaty <mpeaty.domain.name.hidden> wrote:
>
> MP: Two thoughts come to my suspicious mind.
> > 1/ [Not far from the post-Freudian speculation :-] ... Attendance
> > within the event horizon of a common or garden galactic variety black
> > hole would seem to incorporate a one-way ticket *to* the singularity,
> > would it not?
>
>
> Yes, but it could take a very long time to get there in a massive enough
> black hole.
>
> Stathis Papaioannou
>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Fri Mar 09 2007 - 17:39:13 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:13 PST