Le 11-oct.-06, à 05:46, George Levy a écrit :
<snip: I will comment at ease later>
> Therefore from the point of view of the second machine, the first
> machine appears conscious. Note that for the purpose of the argument
> WE don't have to assume initially that the second machine IS
> conscious, only that it can detect if the first machine is conscious.
> Now once we establish that the first machine is conscious we can infer
> that the second machine is also conscious simply because it is
> identical.
How could any machine detect that another machine is conscious? I am
not sure this makes sense imo. We have to come back on this in late
november.
> I'll be traveling to France in early November. We'll leave the
> detailed discussion for later in November.
I go to Bergen (Norway) tomorrow where I will present the AUDA
(Arithmetical UDA). The list has receive the info, see here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/everything-list.domain.name.hidden/msg11097.html
We will most probably have some opportunity to e-talk before your trip
in France,
Bye,
Bruno
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Wed Oct 11 2006 - 08:08:35 PDT