Re: computationalism and supervenience

From: 1Z <peterdjones.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:46:40 -0000

Stathis Papaioannou wrote:

> I'm not necessarily talking about every possible computation being implemented by
> every physical system, just (at least) the subset of finite computations implemented by
> a physical computer or brain. I think this is another way of saying that a recording, or
> a single trace of a computation branching in the multiverse, can be conscious. To prevent
> a recording being consious yoiu can insist on counterfactual behaviour, but that seems an
> ad hoc requirement introduced simply to prevent the "trivial" case of a recording or any
> physical system implementing a computation.

The requirement that computations require counterfactuals isn't
ad hoc, it comes from the observation that computer programmes
include if-then statements.

The idea that everyting is conscious unless there is a good
reason it isn't -- *that* is ad hoc!


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Tue Aug 29 2006 - 10:49:10 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:12 PST