Wow. You're proposeing that quantum theory may be wrong. But if you're
proposing using an  infinity of universes instead of a smooth single one - a
consquence of quantum theory! - then that bypasses the issue.  But why don't
we go to the experts on consciousness, e.g. Dennett, rather than try to
reinvent the wheel here?
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Jacques Bailhache [SMTP:Jacques.Bailhache.domain.name.hidden]
> Sent:	25 January 1999 14:14
> To:	'Higgo James'
> Cc:	'everything-list.domain.name.hidden'; 'Marchal'
> Subject:	RE: Spirit, consciousness, free will and infinite nesting
> 
> Hi James,
> 
> >Hold on , Jacques.  The universe it quantized - there is nothing smaller
> >than a Planck unit. How can you have infinite nesting in a single
> universe?
> 
> Before, the scientists said there was nothing smaller than an atom.
> Who knows what tomorrow's science will discover ?
> I don't see why this infinite nesting couldn't be possible in a single
> universe.
> However, I think there is probably an infinity of universes (see
> http://www.website2u.com/log/text/reflmph/english/hmm.htm,
> http://www.website2u.com/log/text/reflmph/english/hum.htm,
> http://www.website2u.com/log/text/reflmph/english/rfu.htm,
> http://www.website2u.com/log/text/reflmph/english/esprfu.htm)
>  
> 	Jacques.
> ==========================
> Jacques Bailhache
> Y2K Centre of Expertise (BRO)
> DTN: 856 ext. 7662
> Tel: +32-2 729.7662, Fax: +32-2 729.7985
> Email: mailto:Jacques.Bailhache.domain.name.hidden
> Visit my home page : 
> 	http://www.website2u.com/log/index.htm
> 	http://www.byoc.com/homepage/134885/
>  	http://www.chez.com/log/
> 	http://members.rotfl.com/log/
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	Higgo James [SMTP:james.higgo.domain.name.hidden]
> > Sent:	Monday, January 25, 1999 1:07 PM
> > To:	'Marchal'
> > Cc:	'everything-list.domain.name.hidden'
> > Subject:	RE: Spirit, consciousness, free will and infinite nesting
> > 
> > Yes but Jacques is not referring to the infinity of universes which is
> why
> > I
> > specifically said 'in a single universe'.  BTW have you read Vic
> Stenger's
> > atomic metaphysics which gives an alternative 'place' for the infinity,
> in
> > 'nowhen'.
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From:	Marchal [SMTP:marchal.domain.name.hidden]
> > > Sent:	25 January 1999 12:00
> > > To:	Higgo James; 'Jacques Bailhache'
> > > Cc:	'everything-list.domain.name.hidden'
> > > Subject:	RE: Spirit, consciousness, free will and infinite nesting
> > > 
> > > 
> > > James :
> > > >Hold on , Jacques.  The universe it quantized - there is nothing
> > smaller
> > > >than a Planck unit. How can you have infinite nesting in a single
> > > universe?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hold on, James. There is an infinity of "universes". With the DU,
> there 
> > > is an infinity of infinity of "universes" with different quantum
> > constant.
> > > Why should Jacques' infinite nesting be impossible ?
> > > ... unless you are able to derive planck constant from arithmetic. 
> > > 
> > > Bruno
> > > 
> > >  =====================================================================
> > >  | Bruno MARCHAL                   Phone :  +32 (0)2 6502711         |
> > >  | Universite Libre de Bruxelles   Fax   :  +32 (0)2 6502715         |
> > >  |                                 Prive :  +32 (0)2 3439666         |
> > >  | Avenue F.D. Roosevelt, 50                                         |
> > >  | IRIDIA,  CP 194/6                                                 |
> > >  | B-1050   BRUSSELS               Email :  marchal.domain.name.hidden        |
> > >  | Belgium                         URL   :  http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/ |
> > >  =====================================================================
> > > 
Received on Mon Jan 25 1999 - 07:03:58 PST