Re: Numbers

From: 1Z <peterdjones.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 14:13:31 -0800

Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Le 25-mars-06, à 19:17, 1Z a écrit :
>
> > > > > You will miss the consequences of the assumption. All science is based
> > > > > on implicit or explicit assumption, related to (non definable)
> > > > > world-views.

> > > > Almost all science is based on the implicit assumption of a "stuffy"
> > > > world view.

> > >No. This is a simplifying methodological assumption, but there is no
> > >evidence it is necessary. Few physicists use it.

> > I can assure you that real-life physicsists do use it.
>
> Give reference please.
>

Typing "physics matter" into google produces 108,000,000 hits...

http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=physics+matter&btnG=Google+Search&meta=

...happy reading.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sat Mar 25 2006 - 17:14:33 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:11 PST