Re: belief, faith, truth

From: Kim Jones <kimjones.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 17:22:46 +1100

I was just about to ask what an angel was! You must have read my
mind, Bruno.
Non-machine-emulable is angel. OK.



Why do they(?) have to be called "angel"? Can one liken them(?) to
the theological description of an angel or is there some other reason?

regards

Kim Jones


On 08/02/2006, at 8:42 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:

> (by definition an angel is any platonic entity which is not able to
> be emulated by a turing machine).
>
Received on Thu Feb 09 2006 - 01:29:03 PST