Le 13-nov.-05, à 12:32, uv a écrit :
> I had not read your email at the time of my email sent to
> this group, where I tried to explain its relevance. This is
> because of the peculiar way you send emails. I
> mentioned in my email, the fact that this 'strong
> mechanistic' approach of Bruno really leaves a lot of
> the real world outside its bailiwick.
Could you elaborate just a little bit. I am not sure I understand.
> No harm in that
> I suppose, as long as in the process he has somehow
> defined 'which bits' are omitted. But due to the
> reletively puny efforts of Solovay's theorem, I doubt
> if he can.
Why would I eliminate bits? Only aristotelian substances are really
"eliminated"
What do you mean by the last sentence?
Perhaps this is related with some misunderstanding I am alluding to in
the preceding post?
Bruno
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
Received on Mon Nov 14 2005 - 10:27:09 PST