Russell Standish <r.standish.domain.name.hidden>:
> Temporal recurrance requires a finite set of states, or an upper bound
> on the information contained with observer moments. In the sorts of
> plenitudes considered here, there is no such upper bound - OMs can
> contain aribitrarily large amounts of information.
> If we we really did live in Jorge's library of Babel (which is
> finite), then indeed temporal recurrence will be a feature. However,
> if that were the case, we'd have an inexplicable number (the number of
> books in the library).
How do you explain so that QTI allows (from a first person
perspective) this temporal reccurance? I think with this theory you'll
can to follow a same set of instants for an eternity (even if, from a
third person perspective, you'll follow every possible branches)
whereas the probability, on an infinite
lenght of time that you follow anothers sets, will tend towards to infinite...
Received on Mon Nov 14 2005 - 03:29:24 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:11 PST