Re: What Computationalism is and what it is *not*

From: Bruno Marchal <marchal.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 16:37:32 +0200

On 03 Sep 2005, at 20:54, Hal Finney wrote:

> Okay, I was mostly trying to clarify the terminology. The problem is
> that sometimes you use "comp" as if it is the same as
> computationalism,
> and sometimes it seems to include these additional concepts of the
> Church
> Thesis and Arithmetical Realism. Maybe you should come up with a new
> word for the combination of comp (aka "Yes Doctor") + CT + AR.
> Then you
> could make it clear when you are just talking about computationalism,
> and when you are including the additional concepts.


So, just to be clear, I *always* assume Church Thesis and
Arithmetical Realism.
CT is an important part of comp, because it gives the needed level of
generality for
the notion of Universal Machine and the whole of *comp*-uter science.
Arithmetical realism is also assumed by all computer scientist.
Actually I am even quasi-sure that CT does not make sense without AR,
which means that it is not entirely unplausible AR can be suppressed.
I tend to believe also that AR does not make sense without CT, but
that is more controversial and out of topic, really.


Bruno


http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
Received on Tue Sep 06 2005 - 10:42:44 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:11 PST