Dear Bruno,
The duality that I am considering is that proposed by Vaughan Pratt. It
is NOT a "substance" dualism. It is more a "process" dualism. Please see the
ratmech paper for an explanaition. It is found here:
http://boole.stanford.edu/pub/ratmech.pdf
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/pratt95rational.html
Kindest regards,
Stephen
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruno Marchal" <marchal.domain.name.hidden>
To: "Everything-List List" <everything-list.domain.name.hidden>
Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2005 12:44 PM
Subject: Rép : The Time Deniers
> The same can be said with Stephen "dualism". If it is not a "dualism" of
> substance, then a case in favor of a dualism in comp can be made, and this
> despite the immaterialist background.
Received on Sat Jul 09 2005 - 13:26:28 PDT