Re: a description of you + a description of billiard ball can bruise you?

From: Stephen Paul King <stephenk1.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 16:39:15 -0400

Dear Bruno,

    Your claim reminds me of the scene in the movie Matrix: Reloaded where
Neo deactivates some Sentinels all the while believing that he is Unplugged.
This leads to speculations about "matrix in a matrix", etc.

http://www.thematrix101.com/reloaded/meaning.php#mwam

    There is still one question that needs to be answered: what is it that
gives rise to the differentiation necessary for one "description" to
"bruise" (or cause any kind of change) in another "description" if we
disallow for some thing that acts as an "interface" between the two.

   What forms the "interface" in your theory?

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/0001/0001064.pdf

Stephen

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruno Marchal" <marchal.domain.name.hidden>
To: "Jonathan Colvin" <jcolvin.domain.name.hidden>
Cc: <everything-list.domain.name.hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 5:56 AM
Subject: Re: What do you lose if you simply accept...


>
> Le 17-mai-05, à 09:56, Jonathan Colvin a écrit :
>
>> Is it any
>> stranger that a blind man can not see, than that a description of a
>> billiard
>> ball's properties (weight, diameter, colour etc) can not bruise me?
>
>
> It is different with comp. because a description of you + a description of
> billiard ball, done at some right level, can bruise you.
>
> Bruno
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>
>
Received on Tue May 17 2005 - 17:06:48 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:10 PST