> Russell Standish wrote:
>
>
> With my TIME postulate, I say that a conscious observer necessarily
> experiences a sequence of related observer moments (or even a
> continuum of them). To argue that observer moments are independent of
> each other is to argue the negation of TIME. With TIME, the measure of
> each observer moment is relative to the predecessor state, or the RSSA
> is the appropriate principle to use. With not-TIME, each observer
> moment has an absolute measure, the ASSA
>
>
That's an interesting idea, although I do have some problems with it. If
one
completely specifies the state of an observer at a given time, then this
already contains a notion of time as experienced by the observer. So, I
would say that the notion of an abserver moment is more like that of a
tangent space in General Relativity than that of a single space-time point.
Saibal
-------------------------------------------------
Defeat Spammers by launching DDoS attacks on Spam-Websites:
http://www.hillscapital.com/antispam/
Received on Thu May 05 2005 - 10:18:29 PDT