RE: many worlds theory of immortality

From: Stathis Papaioannou <>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 23:01:46 +1000


I've deleted everything, it was getting too messy. I hope this
(semi-)mathematical formulation captures your argument correctly:

Suppose you start with one individual, your friend, on a computer network
which has infinite resources and will grow exponentially forever. This
individual will be duplicated every unit time period, so that after n
generations, there will be 2^n copies. Suppose there is a probability p(n)
that, during a unit time period, any single individual in the nth generation
will be effectively deleted, whether through suicide, murder, local hardware
failure, or whatever. To simplify the maths, assume that if at least one
copy survives, the rest of the 2^n copies in that generation will be
restored from memory; but if all the copies are deleted, then that will be
Real Death for your friend. Now, the probability of Real Death in the nth
generation, given the above, is p(n)^(2^n). If p(n) is a constant, call it
k, this probability will clearly decrease with each generation. The
probability that your friend will never suffer Real Death is then given by
the infinite product:


which I believe converges to a value between 0 and 1 (too lazy to work it
out now) and is another way of making your point, with the geometric series,
that even with an always-nonzero probability that a given individual will
die, if this probability is always decreasing due to exponential growth of
copies of the individual, the probability that at least some copies will
survive indefinitely does not limit to zero.

Now, look at p(n) again. This time, let's say it is not k, but a random real
number greater than zero, smaller than 1, with k being the mean of the
distribution. At first glance, it may appear that not much has changed,
since the probabilities will "on average" be the same, over a long time
period. However, this is not correct. In the above product, p(n) can go
arbitrarily close to 1 for an arbitrarily long run of n, thus reducing the
product value arbitrarily close to zero up to that point, which cannot
subsequently be "made up" by a compensating fall of p(n) close to zero,
since the factor 1-p(n)^(2^n) can never be greater than 1. (Sorry I haven't
put this very elegantly.)

The conclusion is therefore that if p(n) is allowed to vary randomly, Real
Death becomes a certainty over time, even with continuous exponential growth
forever. If you have a real world network, or simulated sentient beings, I
don't believe it is possible eliminate the random lement in this parameter.

--Stathis Papaioannou

Update your mobile with a hot polyphonic ringtone:
Received on Thu Apr 21 2005 - 09:20:34 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:10 PST