RE: many worlds theory of immortality

From: Stathis Papaioannou <stathispapaioannou.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 13:44:30 +1000

Jonathan Colvin wrote:

> >Hal Ruhl wrote:
> >
> >>I know of no reason to assume that the various branches of MWI run
> >>concurrently.
> >>
> >>If they do not run concurrently then the only way I see for
> >immortality
> >>is to be in a branch where immortality is already a possibility
> >>inherent in that branch.
> >
> >Stathis: I don't see why this should be so. Your consciousness should
> >be able to jump between branches, between physical locations
> >and across long periods of time. I have not made up my mind
> >whether it can also jump backwards in time, i.e. if a moment
> >can be experienced as being in your future when in the real
> >world it is actually implemented in the past.
>
>That is, presumably, assuming that the Principle of Indifference is
>correct.
>I've got an issue with the PofI though; the problem of identity, or, how do
>we decide whether a consciousness in a different branch or time is "mine"?
>Is all that is required is that an identical brain-state exist elsewhere or
>elsewhen? Then, as you've noted, there is an issue of sequencing. Why
>assume
>a jump must always be forward in time? With no physical continuity between
>brain-states, our consciousness might get stuck in an endless loop:
>..W>X>Y>Z>X>Y>Z>X>Y>Z>... etc. I suppose that would be an immortality of
>sorts, albeit rather a hellish one; but I suppose we wouldn't "realize" we
>were stuck.
>
>Jonathan Colvin

This question of what constitutes continuity of personal identity comes up
all the time in newsgroups, of course. Even if you adhere to the most
conservative, common sense belief that identity is attached only to a single
animal during its lifetime, you run into problems. *Nothing* need be
physically preserved between any two periods in an animal's life: not the
constituent atoms, not their absolute position in spacetime, not even their
position relative to each other. Your future self from 2006 need only share
some of your memories and the belief that he is you; if he came back to 2005
in a time machine, moved into your home and tried to access your bank
account, the fiction that you are the "same" person would be seen for what
it is.

--Stathis Papaioannou

_________________________________________________________________
Buy want you really want - sell what you don't on eBay:
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/705-10129-5668-323?ID=2
Received on Sun Apr 17 2005 - 23:47:28 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:10 PST