Re: Many worlds theory of immortality

From: Saibal Mitra <smitra.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 02:45:34 +0200

 I don't think that the MW immortality is correct at all! In a certain sense
we are
 immortal, because the enseble of all possible worlds is a fixed static
entity. So,
 you ''always'' find yourselve alive in one state or another. However, you
won't
 experience youself evolving in the infinite far future.


 If you encounter a ''branching'' in which one of the possibilities is
death, that
 branch cannot be said to be nonexistent relative to you. Quantum mechanics
doesn't
 imply that you can never become unconscious, otherwise you could never fall
asleep!


 Of course, you can never experience being unconscious. So, what to do with
the branch
 leading to (almost) certain death? The more information your brain
contains, the smaller the set of branches is in which you are alive (and
consistent with your experiences stored in your brain). The set of all
branches in which you could be alive doesn't contain any information at all.
Since death involves complete
 memory loss, the branch leading to death should be replaced by the complete
set of all possibilities.



Saibal

-------------------------------------------------
Defeat Spammers by launching DDoS attacks on Spam-Websites:
http://www.hillscapital.com/antispam/



>
>
> Quoting nick_h_e_prince <nick_h_e_prince.domain.name.hidden>:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > My apologies to the group for bringing up questions which may have
> > been covererd before but I cannot find an answer to the following
> > query and I am new to the group.
> >
> > Firstly I am sure I have read that Bruno Marchal had come up with a
> > proof of the no cul de sac conjecture - does anyone have a reference
> > for this?
> >
> > I also have a question to put to anyone who has some ideas as follows:
> >
> > If the MW immortality is correct the would we not only be immortal but
> > also very alone in the end. We know that we observe others die so
> > since we always find ourselves in a branch of the multiverse where we
> > live on - the conclusion seems inescapable
> >
> > Can anyone figure a way out of such inevitable eternal loneliness
> > because I rather like to chat to my freinds!!
> >
> > Nick Prince
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> Versatel ADSL Gratis. De voordelen van gratis internet met de
> snelheid van ADSL. Zonder abonnementskosten en zonder vast contract.
> Je betaalt alleen voor de tijd online. Nu zonder aansluitkosten en
> met gratis modem. Bestel snel op www.versatel.nl.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
> What would our lives be like without music, dance, and theater?
> Donate or volunteer in the arts today at Network for Good!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/pkgkPB/SOnJAA/Zx0JAA/pyIolB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------------~->
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Fabric-of-Reality/
>
> <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Fabric-of-Reality-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
>
> <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
Received on Wed Apr 13 2005 - 20:53:45 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:10 PST