Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model

From: Hal Ruhl <HalRuhl.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:29:02 -0500

In my [is, is not] definitional pair the "is not" component is the All
minus the "is" component.

Thus the "is not" member is not simply unwinged horses or the like. In
most of these pairs I suspect the "is not" component has no apparent
usefulness [to most SAS [if they exist]]. Be that as it may both members
of the [All, Nothing] pair seem to have usefulness.

Hal

   
Received on Wed Nov 17 2004 - 19:38:58 PST