Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model

From: Georges Quenot <Georges.Quenot.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:39:17 +0100

Hal Ruhl wrote:
>
> [...]
> The idea that defining a thing actually defines two things seems self
> evident [once you notice it].
> At least one case of unavoidable definition also seems self evident
> [once you notice it].

The problem with evidence is that on one side there is no other
known basis to build certainties and on the other it appears to
be very relative [once you notice it]. :-)

Also, (self) evidence that seems so sounds like a pleonasm to me.

Georges.
Received on Tue Nov 16 2004 - 17:44:51 PST