Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model

From: Georges Quenot <>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:39:17 +0100

Hal Ruhl wrote:
> [...]
> The idea that defining a thing actually defines two things seems self
> evident [once you notice it].
> At least one case of unavoidable definition also seems self evident
> [once you notice it].

The problem with evidence is that on one side there is no other
known basis to build certainties and on the other it appears to
be very relative [once you notice it]. :-)

Also, (self) evidence that seems so sounds like a pleonasm to me.

Received on Tue Nov 16 2004 - 17:44:51 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:10 PST