Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model

From: Hal Ruhl <HalRuhl.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 19:03:48 -0500

To answer a few other comments/questions:

Boundaries: I have as I said in one post of this thread and as I recall in
some earlier related threads defined information as a potential to erect a
boundary. So the All is chuck full of this potential. Actual boundaries
are the Everything and any evolving Something.

Something(s): In my model these are evolving universes and not anti
Nothings. The All is the anti Nothing.

Definitions: The only definitions for which I identify both members of the
[is, is not] pair are the [All,Nothing] pair and the complementary
Somethings pairs. [Is, is not] pairs are not alternates or true/false
comparisons but are rather information/content complements. The Everything
is a boundary and its complement is all other boundaries. True noise is a
concept re information flow and its complement is all other concepts.

The All and the Nothing are not mutually exclusive. Perhaps the
"exclusive" idea is based on a hidden assumption of some sort of space that
can only be filled with or somehow contain one or the other but not both.

Hal



  
Received on Mon Nov 15 2004 - 19:13:19 PST