Hi Benjamin:
Norman's comments as I indicated in a response completely miss the essence
of my model.
Hal
At 06:25 PM 11/15/2004, you wrote:
>Norman's answer sounds pretty good to me. I also checked
>http://www.nothing.com/ & found maybe or maybe not nothing
>there. Something's also at http://www.something.com - Ben Udell.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Norman Samish" <ncsamish.domain.name.hidden>
>To: "Hal Ruhl" <HalRuhl.domain.name.hidden>
>Cc: <everything-list.domain.name.hidden>
>Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 6:10 PM
>Subject: Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model
>
>
>Hal,
>I'm way out of my depth, but if I'm correctly interpreting what you are
>saying, it looks to me that your multiverse model cannot be valid.
>
>This is because it answers the question "Why does anything exist?" with
>the answer "Because it's not possible to conceive of Nothing, since the
>concept of Nothing is Something."
>
>However, this answer requires Something that conceptualizes. Suppose that
>Something is not there? If there were Nothing, there could be no Something.
>
>Norman
Received on Mon Nov 15 2004 - 18:54:57 PST