Re: Are we simulated by some massive computer?

From: Hal Ruhl <HalRuhl.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 18:01:48 -0400

Hi John:

Thanks for the message.

Perhaps one could call the incompleteness of the "Nothing" a "vacuum
energy" because it always has and always will drive the dynamic of my system.

Hal

At 06:56 PM 5/6/2004, you wrote:
>Hal,
>before the time when we met on another list I tackled 'similar'
>concerns. Very briefly:
>I picked "nothingness" rather than "nothing". The first reaction was: If I
>consider "nothingness" at all, it already became "somethingness". This was
>how I started to build up the world
>at that time (~1990).
>Later I learned about the (alleged) energy content of vacuum,
>(calculkated some ^120 of the material content of our universe...) which has
>fit perfectly in my own nonsense-speculation.
>Just a reminiscense
>Cheers
>John Mikes
Received on Fri May 14 2004 - 18:06:15 PDT