Re: Bruno's UDA argument

From: H J Ruhl <>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 21:19:36 -0700

Dear Bruno:

I remain confident that there is a link between what we both are saying.

I think I must do my homework and closely study your argument. I hope
circumstances will allow this.



At 7/23/02, you wrote:
>At 22:11 -0700 22/07/2002, H J Ruhl wrote:
>>Is it possible to sustain a no information Everything if there is a
>>selection in which this latter ensemble is the only generators subject to
>>such noise? The very concept of any selection within the Everything
>>necessarily places information within the Everything and must thus be
>It is here that the 1-3 distinction, or the comp 1- indeterminacy paves
>the way. (If I understand what you say).
Received on Tue Jul 23 2002 - 18:22:59 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:07 PST