Re: White Rabbits, WAND gates and WACOs
More on White Rabbits.
Here is a thought experiment which attempts to prove the non existence of
White Rabbits and of Black Rabbits.
Definitions:
1) White Rabbits: phenomena that we cannot understand. Their existence
indicates that the set of physical phenomena is larger than the set of ideas
2) Black Rabbits: ideas we can think of but which are not simulatable with
computers based on physical laws. i.e., not implementable on a
analog/digital computer. Their existence indicates that the set of physical
phenomena is smaller than the set of ideas.
Goal
Demonstrate that
Set(White Rabbits) = 0;
Set(Black Rabbits) = 0
and thus prove that the mental universe is identical in size to the physical
universe
Assumption:
COMP hypothesis: People thoughts can be simulated by a computer
Converse COMP hypothesis: A computer program can be understood by a person.
(hmmmm....)
Reminder:
Church/Turing Thesis: All algorithmic functions can be simulated by a
computer.
Converse Church Thesis: A computer can only simulate algorithmic functions
Proof:
Let's proceed via absurdum.
1) Let's say there are White Rabbits. Let's be a little more precise and say
that there are devices (a kind of transistor that produces White Rabbits
logic operations: WAND gates. Wonderful! I am an engineer and I'll use one of
these WAND gates in the design of a White Rabbit Computer (WACO) just to fool
the hackers, the CIA, the FBI, the KGB and the IRS. However, since a WACO
can incorporate a WAND gate, so can a person (by the COMP hypothesis). Hence
a person should be capable of generating the same outputs as the WACO and
therefore predict a WACO (unless the White Rabbits device generates a totally
random signal as in QM).
Hence no White Rabbits.
2) Now lets say Black Rabbits exist. It means that I can think of a Black
Rabbit but I can't program one on a computer. (I have done that so many
times!!!! :-) )
By the COMP hypothesis all ideas should be programmable.
Hence no Black Rabbits.
Therefore Mental Universe == Physical Universe
I realize the proof is shaky.... kind of like prestigitation with
rabbits???... but it is a starting point....:-)
George
Received on Thu Jun 21 2001 - 22:34:39 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:07 PST