RE: The Rapidly-Accelerating Computer

From: Higgo James <james.higgo.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 17:16:00 +0100

It is meaninless fr5om an objective point of view, but from a 'classical
universe perspective' it has meaning. There is no objective meaning other
that 'everything exists'.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: hal.domain.name.hidden [SMTP:hal.domain.name.hidden.org]
> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 5:06 PM
> To: everything-list.domain.name.hidden; hal.domain.name.hidden.org;
> james.higgo.domain.name.hidden
> Subject: RE: The Rapidly-Accelerating Computer
>
> James writes:
> > There is no distinction. No observer-moments are related. No
> observations
> > are related to events. But of course, all observer-moments exists, and
> all
> > events exist, so you could argue that all observations are accurate.
>
> So in this formulation, the question of whether a RAC could exist is
> meaningless? That doesn't sound like a very useful approach.
>
> Hal
Received on Fri Sep 15 2000 - 09:17:54 PDT