RE: The Rapidly-Accelerating Computer
James writes:
> There is no distinction. No observer-moments are related. No observations
> are related to events. But of course, all observer-moments exists, and all
> events exist, so you could argue that all observations are accurate.
So in this formulation, the question of whether a RAC could exist is
meaningless? That doesn't sound like a very useful approach.
Hal
Received on Fri Sep 15 2000 - 09:14:49 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:07 PST